Tuesday, February 24, 2026 · U.S. Tokenization Intelligence
AMERICA TOKENIZATION
The Vanderbilt Terminal for U.S. Asset Tokenization
INDEPENDENT INTELLIGENCE FOR THE AMERICAN TOKENIZATION ECONOMY
US Tokenized RWA Market $36B+ +380% since 2022
·
BUIDL Fund AUM $2.5B BlackRock · Largest tokenized fund
·
SEC-Registered Platforms 12+ ATS + Transfer Agent licenses
·
Tokenized US Treasuries $9B+ +256% YoY
·
US VC into Tokenization $34B 2025 total · doubled YoY
·
Broadridge DLR Daily Volume $384B +490% YoY · Dec 2025
·
Securitize AUM $4B+ +841% revenue growth 2025
·
Tokenized Private Credit $19B+ Figure Technologies leads at $15B
·
US Tokenized RWA Market $36B+ +380% since 2022
·
BUIDL Fund AUM $2.5B BlackRock · Largest tokenized fund
·
SEC-Registered Platforms 12+ ATS + Transfer Agent licenses
·
Tokenized US Treasuries $9B+ +256% YoY
·
US VC into Tokenization $34B 2025 total · doubled YoY
·
Broadridge DLR Daily Volume $384B +490% YoY · Dec 2025
·
Securitize AUM $4B+ +841% revenue growth 2025
·
Tokenized Private Credit $19B+ Figure Technologies leads at $15B
·

Tokenized US Treasuries Tracker

Tracking every tokenized US government fund — BlackRock BUIDL, Franklin FOBXX, Ondo OUSG, Superstate, and competitors — with live AUM, yield, and platform data.

Tokenized US Treasury products are the breakout story of the 2024–2026 period in real-world asset tokenization. What started as a niche product — Ondo Finance launching OUSG to allow DeFi protocols to hold yield-bearing collateral — has become an institutional battleground. BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, Fidelity, WisdomTree, and a dozen fintech challengers are now competing for the same institutional and semi-institutional dollar: cash management capital that wants US government yield with on-chain programmability.

TOTAL MARKET
$9.2B+
Across all tokenized US Treasury products as of Q1 2026 — BUIDL accounts for 27% · Source: RWA.xyz, individual fund disclosures

The $9.2 billion figure understates the strategic importance of the category. These products serve as collateral in DeFi lending protocols, as on-chain cash equivalents for crypto-native treasuries, and as institutional money-market alternatives for firms that want programmable settlement. The use case is not just “earn yield on-chain” — it is fundamentally restructuring how institutional capital moves between traditional and decentralized finance.

Fund Comparison Table

FundIssuerAUM (Q1 2026)BlockchainYieldMin. InvestmentAccredited Only
BUIDLBlackRock / Securitize$2.5B+Ethereum5.2%$5,000,000Yes
FOBXXFranklin Templeton$700M+Polygon, Stellar5.1%$1No (money market)
OUSGOndo Finance$700M+Ethereum, Solana5.0%$100,000Yes
USDYOndo Finance$400M+Ethereum, Solana, Mantle, Aptos5.2%No minimum (non-US)Non-US only
Superstate USTBSuperstate$350M+Ethereum5.1%$100,000Yes
Maple CashMaple Finance$200M+Solana5.0%$100,000Yes
OpenEden TBILLOpenEden$150MEthereum5.1%$100,000Yes
WisdomTree Govt MMWisdomTree$100M+Stellar5.0%$1No (money market)
Hashnote USYCHashnote$700M+Ethereum5.2%InstitutionalYes
BlackRock USD Inst.BlackRock / Circle$300M+Ethereum5.1%InstitutionalYes

Growth Trajectory

The category crossed $1 billion in March 2024 — barely two years after the first products launched. It crossed $5 billion in September 2024 and $9 billion by Q1 2026. If the current 15% monthly growth rate sustains even partially, the market could reach $25 billion by end of 2026.

GROWTH RATE
+460%
Category growth January 2024 through Q1 2026 · From $1.6B to $9.2B · Source: RWA.xyz

BUIDL’s trajectory deserves particular attention. Launched in March 2024 with $5 million minimum investment and Ethereum-only access, it crossed $500 million in under two months, $1 billion by July 2024, and $2.5 billion by early 2026. BlackRock’s brand, Securitize’s institutional distribution infrastructure, and the fund’s use as collateral on Aave, Morpho, and other DeFi protocols drove adoption far faster than any comparable traditional fund launch.

Competition Dynamics

The competitive landscape is bifurcated between institutional-grade products and retail-accessible alternatives.

Institutional-grade products (BUIDL, Superstate, Hashnote, Maple Cash) compete primarily on brand, minimum investment, blockchain rails, and integration with institutional DeFi protocols. BUIDL’s $5 million minimum means it is not competing for the same dollar as Ondo’s OUSG. Speed of redemption, legal structure clarity, and smart contract auditability matter more than yield in this segment — yield spreads are narrow (5.0–5.3% reflects Fed Funds target rate, not manager skill).

Retail-accessible products (FOBXX, WisdomTree) are regulated money market funds that happen to be on blockchain — they compete with Vanguard and Fidelity money market funds, not with DeFi yield products. Franklin Templeton’s FOBXX with its $1 minimum is genuinely novel: a fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that records share ownership on a public blockchain. It has not yet attracted retail capital at scale ($700 million is predominantly institutional), suggesting marketing and distribution challenges remain.

What Differentiates Each Product

Three factors drive differentiation beyond yield: (1) Blockchain choice — Ethereum dominates because that’s where DeFi liquidity lives, but Solana-based products (Maple, Ondo) attract DeFi-native capital seeking lower transaction costs; (2) Redemption mechanics — BUIDL operates T+0 redemption via Circle’s USDC, while some products take T+1 or T+2, which matters for collateral use cases; (3) Legal structure — regulated money market funds (FOBXX, WisdomTree) carry different legal protections than private fund structures (BUIDL, Superstate), which affects institutional due diligence timelines.

The next phase of competition will be won by whichever products achieve native integration with the largest DeFi lending protocols and institutional portfolio management systems — not by yield optimization.

Related Trackers: US Tokenized RWA Dashboard · Institutional Adoption · Secondary Market Liquidity